Artifacts / Restorative Dentistry / View Video

Video: The Five Pillars of Bonding Success

Categories: Restorative Dentistry

Target Audience: Dental Assistants, Dentists

Duration: 2:02

View Video

Video File: 

The Five Pillars of Bonding

Synopsis

Ronald D. Perry, DMD, Director of the Gavel Center for Restorative Research and Clinical Professor at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, as well as a practicing dentist, discusses the importance of doing your research before choosing a bonding agent. Dr. Perry emphasizes the Five Pillars of bonding—in-vivo efficacy without post-operative pain, marginal integrity, bond compatibility, long-term durability, and consistency of strength and adhesion—which dental professionals can use as a guide to ensure they are using a bonding agent that will lead to successful outcomes for the patient and the practice.

1. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3(2):185-94.
2. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW, Halken J, et al. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: a prospective 8 years follow up. J Dent. 2013;41(4):297-306.
3. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):87-101.
4. Laccabue M, Ahlf R, Simecek J. Frequency of restoration replacement in posterior teeth for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel. Oper Dent. 2013. [Epub ahead of print].
5. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, et al. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mat. 2011;27(1):17-28.
6. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):1-16.
7. Santini A, Ivanovic V, Ibbetson R, et al. Influence of cavity configuration on microleakage around Class V restorations bonded with seven self-etching adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(2):128-36.
8. Barcellos D, Batista G, Silva M, et al. Two-year clinical performance of self-etching adhesive systems in composite restorations of anterior teeth. Oper Dent. 2013;38(3):258-66.
9. Di Hipólito V, de Goes MF, Carrilho MR, et al. SEM evaluation of contemporary self-etching primers applied to ground and unground enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(3):203-11.
10. Van Meerbeek B. OptiBond XTR 12 month clinical evaluation.
11. Hashimoto M, Tay FR, Svizero NR, de Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Sano H, Kaga M, Pashley DH. The effects of common errors on sealing ability of total-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2006 Jun;22(6):560-8.
12. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M. et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84(2):118-132.
13. Kerr Corporation. Orange Ca.
14. Stanley HR. Human Pulpal Response to operative dental procedures. Gainesville FL Storter Printing Co. 1976.
15. Brannstrom, M. Etiology of dentin hypersensitivity. Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society Suomen Hammaslaakariseuran toimituksia. 1992;88 Suppl 1: 7-13.
16. Gross JD, Retief DH, Bradley EL. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1985;1:7-10.
17. Fusayama T. Factors and prevention of pulp irritation by adhesive composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int. 1987;18;633-641.
18. Ikeda, T; Nakano, M; Bando, E; Suzuki. The effect of light premature occlusal contact on tooth pain threshold in Humans. A J Oral Rehab. 1998; 25:589-95.
19. Brännstrom M. The cause of post restorative sensitivity and its prevention. J Endod 1986;12:475-481.
20. Nakabayashi N. Pashley DH. Hybridization of Dental Hard Tissues. Tokyo: Quintessence Publishing Co LTD; 1998:79.
21. Freedman G. Contemporary Esthetic Dentistry. St Louis, Mo: Elsevier Mosby; 2012:195.
22. Terry DA, Leinfelder KF, Geller W. Aesthetic & Restorative Dentistry: Material Selection & Technique. Stillwater, MN. Everest Publishing Media; 2009: 422.
23. Denehy G, Cob D, Bouschlicher M, Vargas M. Two-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer/adhesive in posterior composite. J Dent Res. 2002;81:A-80 Abstract 434.
24. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives Part II etching effects of unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001;17(5): 430-444.
25. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15(1):32-42.
26. Hara AT, Amaral CM, Pimenta LA, Sinhoreti MA. Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. Am J Dent. 1999;12(4):181-184.
27. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? J Adhes Dent. 2008 Oct;10(5):339-44.
28. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yu CK, et al. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part 1. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(1):27-40.
29. Walter R, Swift EJ Jr, Ritter AV, Bartholomew WW, Gibson CG. Dentin bonding of an etch-and-rinse adhesive using self- and light-cured composites. Am J Dent. 2009;22(4):215-8.
30. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, et al. Micromorphological changes in resin-dentin bonds after 1 year of water storage. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(3):306-311.
31. Brackett MG, Tay FR, Brackett WW, et al. In vivo chlorhexidine stabilization of hybrid layers of an acetone-based dentin adhesive. Oper Dent. 2009;34(4):379-383.
32. Reis A, Loguercio AD, Azevedo CL, de Carvalho RM, da Julio Singer M, Grande RH. Moisture spectrum of demineralized dentin for adhesive systems with different solvent bases. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(3):183-92.
33. Suh BI. Principles of Adhesion Dentistry. Newtown, Pa: Aegis Communications; 2013:25.

Videos 5 of 63